The Mizo Ancestral Altar and Its Striking Parallels to the Hebrew Altar of Ancient Israel By Dr. Elisheva Zodingliani In a compelling exploration of cultural heritage and ancient religious practices, Dr. Elisheva Zodingliani presents new insights into the intriguing similarities between the ancestral altar of the Mizo people in Northeast India and the Hebrew altar of ancient Israel. This study opens a wider dialogue around the possibility of historical, cultural, or even spiritual connections between the Mizos and the Israelites, a subject that continues to captivate anthropologists, historians, and religious scholars alike. In traditional Mizo society, the ancestral altar—referred to as Sialhah or Sielhah—held significant religious and communal importance. It served as the central site for worship rituals, sacrificial offerings, and communication with Pathian, the supreme deity, or other ancestral spirits. These altars were typically constructed using uncut stones arranged with meticulous care and reverence. Notably, the use of iron tools in their construction was deliberately avoided, a practice rooted in beliefs about ritual impurity. Sacrifices, particularly of animals like pigs, chickens, or mithuns (a local bovine species), were offered at these altars as acts of thanksgiving, atonement, or to seek blessings. The village priest, known as the Puithiam, oversaw the rituals and served as a vital intermediary between the spiritual and earthly realms. The Hebrew altar, as described in the Old Testament (particularly in Exodus 20:24–26 and Deuteronomy 27:5–6), shares numerous characteristics with its Mizo counterpart. In ancient Israel, altars were constructed using unhewn stones, in accordance with divine commandment: “If you make an altar of stones for me, do not build it with dressed stones, for you will defile it if you use a tool on it” (Exodus 20:25). Similar to Mizo customs, iron tools were prohibited in the construction process, emphasizing spiritual purity. Animal sacrifices were a foundational part of Israelite worship, serving functions such as atonement, peace offerings, and thanksgiving. These altars—first housed in the Tabernacle and later in the Temple at Jerusalem—were focal points of communal religious life, led by priests (Kohanim) who performed mediatory roles similar to the Mizo Puithiam. The parallels between these two ancient traditions are striking: the emphasis on uncut stone construction, the centrality of animal sacrifice, the avoidance of iron tools, the existence of a priestly class, and the communal nature of worship. Such similarities have led to several theories regarding possible connections. One widely discussed hypothesis is that the Mizos may be descendants of the Israelite tribe of Manasseh—one of the “Lost Tribes” exiled after the Assyrian conquest in 722 BCE. Proponents of this theory cite not only the ritualistic parallels but also linguistic and cultural clues found among the Mizo people. Others suggest the similarities may be a result of ancient cultural diffusion, perhaps through long-lost trade routes or migratory movements that brought Middle Eastern traditions into Southeast Asia. A third perspective points to the possibility of independent divine revelation—that different cultures, separated by geography and time, may have received similar spiritual instructions. In contemporary times, most Mizos identify as Christians, and many within the community perceive these ancestral parallels as divine affirmation of their spiritual journey. While no conclusive genetic or archaeological evidence has yet confirmed a direct link to the Israelites, the cultural resonance of these traditions remains strong. Researchers continue to examine this phenomenon as a fascinating example of how seemingly unrelated civilizations may develop comparable religious practices. Ultimately, the similarities between the Mizo Sialhah and the Hebrew altar transcend mere coincidence. Whether rooted in shared ancestry, spiritual synchronicity, or anthropological convergence, the connection invites ongoing scholarly attention. For the Mizo people, this isn’t just a question of history—it’s a search for identity, legacy, and divine purpose. Further interdisciplinary research in fields like genetics, linguistics, and comparative theology may one day bring more definitive answers. Until then, the Mizo-Hebrew altar connection remains a remarkable and enduring enigma in the annals of world culture
************************
